My first reaction is that it
was very difficult not to include images or video in the step-by-step
instructions of the lesson. In addition, it was hard to find resources or
hyperlinks online without video or images that support the lesson that I was
designing. Writing out the steps also took more time than I would normally
spend on creating the instructional materials. It would be much easier to find a
video that someone has already made to align with the lesson.
On the other hand, using only
text and hyperlinks made me think through the steps and brainstorm the sequence
of the activities more than usual. In the past, I have been guilty of finding
videos that include additional or irrelevant information along with the
concepts that I am teaching because it was a quicker way to develop the lesson
or professional development session. However, I know that the step-by-step text
directions that I have provided are all relevant and will save the learner time because they will not be
receiving information that is not relevant to the current lesson. As a learner,
I often get frustrated when videos and information is not aligned in an
organized and logically sequenced manner with the instruction because it wastes
the learner’s time sorting through the information. In some instances, this format could be helpful for students because it provides a written step-by-step process of learning. The cognitivist theory supports lessons that provide structures students can use and internalize so the structures or procedures can be used to solve problems when new situations arise (Ertmer and Newby, 2013).
Providing only text and
hypertext in the instructional document limits the examples that can be
provided to the learner. Teachers must take into consideration how to present
information to their individual students because students have various learning
styles. For example, some students are visual learners and some students are auditory
learners. The lesson materials should include references for all learning
styles being addressed.
Ertmer, P. A. and Newby, T. J. (2013), Behaviorism,
Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features From an Instructional
Design Perspective. Perf. Improvement Qrtly, 26: 43–71.
doi: 10.1002/piq.21143
No comments:
Post a Comment